Invention Title:

Information Systems that Detect, Diagnose, and Mitigate Cognitive Errors and Logical Fallacies

Publication number:

US20250190706

Publication date:
Section:

Physics

Class:

G06F40/30

Inventors:

Assignee:

Applicant:

Drawings (2 of 2)

Smart overview of the Invention

The patent application introduces a sophisticated system designed to detect, diagnose, and mitigate cognitive errors and logical fallacies in various forms of content, including text, images, and videos. Utilizing advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods, the system processes input data directly and provides feedback to enhance users' reasoning and argumentation skills. The system is versatile, capable of operating independently or as part of larger platforms such as social media. Training is achieved through machine learning algorithms, leveraging databases and human annotations.

Field and Background

This invention pertains to systems that address cognitive biases and logical fallacies. It relates to existing tools like Grammarly for grammar correction and fact-checking services like Snopes. However, it extends beyond these by focusing on improving the quality of reasoning in both written and spoken materials. The system aims to refine the user's thought process, offering a significant advancement over traditional grammar and spell-checking tools.

Functionality

Users can submit content through an API from any computing device. The system returns an annotated version highlighting potential cognitive biases or logical fallacies. It predicts the consequences of these errors and suggests mitigation strategies. This process is powered by machine learning, large language models, and AI algorithms that understand human cognition and logical reasoning comprehensively. The system covers a wide range of cognitive errors detailed in the application's appendix.

Applications

  • Academic Writing: Provides real-time feedback to improve research papers by identifying logical fallacies and cognitive biases.
  • Managerial Decision-Making: Evaluates reports to highlight biases and improve decision-making processes.
  • Education: Enhances critical thinking by providing feedback on students' arguments.
  • Public Discourse: Analyzes speeches and media articles to improve discourse quality.
  • Marketing Communications: Helps marketers create more effective messages by identifying biases and fallacies.
  • AI Argument Generation: Improves AI-generated arguments by detecting flaws and biases.
  • Online Discourse: Promotes critical thinking on online platforms by analyzing user-generated content.

Conclusion

The system offers significant potential across various fields by enhancing the quality of arguments and reasoning through AI-driven analysis. By identifying cognitive errors and logical fallacies, it not only improves individual writing and decision-making but also elevates public discourse quality. Its integration into educational settings and online platforms can foster a more informed and critically thinking society.